Australia’s Usman Khawaja has found himself in hot water after being charged by the International Cricket Council (ICC) for wearing a black armband during their recent Test match against Pakistan at the Optus Stadium in Perth.
Khawaja’s actions came as a protest during Australia’s 360-run victory over Pakistan in the first Test of their three-match series. Despite the win, Khawaja’s decision to wear the armband has led to repercussions as the ICC has charged him for displaying a personal message without prior approval from Cricket Australia and the ICC.
According to the ICC statement, Khawaja has been charged for breaching Clause F of the Clothing and Equipment Regulations, which prohibits players from displaying personal messages without authorization. The statement also outlined that the sanction for a first offense is a reprimand.
“This is a breach under the category of an ‘other breach’ and the sanction for a first offense is a reprimand,” said an ICC spokesperson.
This incident is not the first time Khawaja has found himself at the center of controversy regarding his attire. Prior to this, he had worn shoes with slogans such as ‘Freedom is a human right’ and ‘All lives are equal’ during Australia’s net session before the first Test against Pakistan. However, he was informed that wearing these shoes would breach ICC rules.
Following this ban on his shoes, Khawaja had taken to social media to express his intent to challenge the ICC guidelines. His recent protest with the black armband seems to be another manifestation of his desire to make a statement.
“The game of cricket is a wonderful game. It’s a game that brings people together. It’s a game that’s played in many different countries around the world. I think it should be a reflection of society,” Khawaja had said in a statement on social media.
The ICC Code of Conduct strictly prohibits players from using clothing or equipment to convey messages related to political, religious, or racial causes without prior approval. The ICC has always maintained a strict stance on such matters to ensure that the game remains free from any external influences.
This development has once again highlighted the fine line between personal expression and adherence to the regulations set by the governing body. As the case unfolds, it will be interesting to see how Khawaja and the ICC navigate through this issue, which has sparked a debate on the role of personal expression in the context of international cricket.
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
