Day five of the Boxing Day Test at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) brought plenty of drama when Indian opener Yashasvi Jaiswal was dismissed in a controversial decision. The third umpire overturned the on-field call, despite the Snickometer showing no spike, sparking a heated debate among players, experts, and fans alike.
Jaiswal, who had been a rock for India, was visibly upset as he walked off after a hard-fought 84 runs off 208 balls. His innings had kept India’s hopes alive, making the decision a bitter pill to swallow for the Indian camp. It wasn’t just frustration—it reignited questions about how consistent technology-assisted umpiring really is.
The Dismissal: A Closer Look
The controversy unfolded in the 71st over of India’s chase. Pat Cummins delivered a short ball down the leg side, and Jaiswal, attempting a pull shot, seemed to miss it entirely. Australia, though, appealed loudly, claiming a faint edge. The on-field umpire said “not out,” but Cummins wasn’t convinced and went for a review.
Here’s where things got sticky. The Snickometer showed no spike as the ball passed the bat, but the third umpire noticed a slight deflection. That was deemed “conclusive evidence,” overturning the on-field call and sending Jaiswal back to the pavilion.
Jaiswal wasn’t happy—and it showed. He exchanged words with the on-field umpires before trudging off, while the Indian crowd at the MCG erupted in disbelief. On the other hand, Australian fans celebrated the breakthrough.
Expert Opinions: Divided as Always
Former elite ICC umpire Simon Taufel chimed in during Channel 7’s coverage, supporting the decision. “From my perspective, it was out,” Taufel said. He explained that the third umpire relied on the deflection, which was considered enough evidence, even though the Snickometer didn’t show an audio spike. According to Taufel, visual evidence can outweigh audio under the current protocols.
But this didn’t sit well with many fans and pundits, who questioned whether the rules were applied consistently. Social media lit up with demands for more transparency in using technology for these high-stakes calls.
Jaiswal’s Performance: Grit and Redemption
Controversy aside, Jaiswal’s innings was a masterclass in resilience. Walking in under pressure after early wickets, he anchored the Indian chase with remarkable calm, facing 208 balls for his 84 runs. This knock was even more impressive considering the young opener had earlier dropped three critical catches in the match.
Watch: Sam Konstas Mocks Virat Kohli, Sparks Viral Moment at MCG
One of those misses let Marnus Labuschagne pile on more runs for Australia, increasing their lead. But Jaiswal redeemed himself with the bat, frustrating Australia’s bowlers and earning respect from the crowd—until the controversial dismissal cut his innings short.
A Game-Changing Moment
Jaiswal’s wicket turned the tide. His exit left India’s lower order exposed to Australia’s aggressive bowling attack, and the momentum quickly shifted to the hosts.
But instead of just focusing on the cricket, much of the discussion post-match revolved around the controversial dismissal. Fans demanded better consistency in how technology is used to make such crucial decisions. In the end, the drama overshadowed what had been a gripping day of Test cricket.
Stay updated with all the cricketing action, follow Cricadium on WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Telegram and Instagram
